<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>ManagingMoney.com</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.managingmoney.com/weblog/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.managingmoney.com/weblog/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.managingmoney.com,2008:/weblog/1</id>
    <link rel="service.post" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.managingmoney.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1" title="ManagingMoney.com" />
    <updated>2008-08-20T14:57:59Z</updated>
    <subtitle>Personal Finance Blog that helps consumers Save Money, Make Money, and better Organize their Financial Lives.</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.2-en</generator>
 

<entry>
    <title>Funding Your Weight loss Surgery</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.managingmoney.com/weblog/2008/08/funding_your_weight_loss_surge.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.managingmoney.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=521" title="Funding Your Weight loss Surgery" />
    <id>tag:www.managingmoney.com,2008:/weblog//1.521</id>
    
    <published>2008-08-20T14:10:45Z</published>
    <updated>2008-08-20T14:57:59Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Everyone has heard about the numerous types of weight loss surgeries available for the seriously obese, and if you find yourself considering such a drastic solution to your weight problem, the whopping $20,000 cost may cause you to reconsider. Even...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mike - Editor</name>
        <uri>http://www.ManagingMoney.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Expense Reduction" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.managingmoney.com/weblog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Everyone has heard about the numerous types of weight loss surgeries available for the seriously obese, and if you find yourself considering such a drastic solution to your weight problem, the whopping $20,000 cost may cause you to reconsider. Even those with the best insurance usually end up spending some money out of pocket, but if you don't have insurance at all, or your insurance refuses the cover the surgery, don't allow the high cost of the surgery to deter you, because as the old saying goes, "where there's a will there's a way."</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Although payment arrangements are often acceptable to pay for weight loss surgery, you could end up paying a substantial amount of money on a monthly basis. If you can't comfortably afford to pay the equivalence of a car payment each month yet your insurance refuses to cover all or most of your surgery, your best bet would be to appeal the insurance's decision. Have your doctor send letters on your behalf, describing health conditions that are caused by your obesity and how these conditions could end up being more expensive than the surgery as they progress.</p>

<p>If on the other hand, you have no health insurance, you should by all means check to see if you're eligible for your state's health insurance, such as Medicaid. Most state Medicaid plans cover weight loss surgery without any anticipated denials as long as it's proven that the surgery is medically necessary. The problem with state health insurance is that in order to qualify, your income must be extremely low. Unfortunately, if you're working even part time, then you most likely don't qualify for Medicaid. If you check your local Yellow Pages, you will be able to locate and contact any special insurance plans created specifically for those wishing to undergo surgery to lose weight.</p>

<p>If you have fairly good credit, obtaining a loan from your bank or credit union is always an option. Your payments may or may not be lower than if you receive financing through the bariatric center where you're having your procedure done. There are also numerous types of finance companies that specialize in providing loans for all types of medical procedures, including some specifically for weight loss surgery. These types of finance companies usually require good credit, so if yours is less-than-perfect than you may be better off choosing another option.</p>

<p>If you've made the decision to rid yourself of your excess weight by opting for surgery, don't worry about not being able to pay the costs that you're responsible for. Whether your insurance agrees to pay all, some, or nothing at all, if you're determined to get weight loss surgery, there are ways to finance your surgery. If your situation is dire, and you need the surgery to help reverse life threatening conditions, there are charities available that may donate money toward your surgery. Your bariatric surgeon can refer you to such organizations.</p>

<p>If you are very obese and your excess weight is minimizing your quality of life, yet you have exhausted all of your financing options, you should be aware that there are alternatives to weight loss surgery. By choosing a healthy, safe alternative, you'll not only be minimizing your chances of experiencing the life threatening complications of surgery, but you'll also save a great deal of money as well. There are wonderful, successful programs, such as Medifast, a medically supervised weight loss program, Weight Watchers, Nutri-System, and many others that cost substantially less than surgery, but work just as well.<br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Waste Services Industry Consolidation Attempts</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.managingmoney.com/weblog/2008/08/waste_services_industry_consol.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.managingmoney.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=522" title="Waste Services Industry Consolidation Attempts" />
    <id>tag:www.managingmoney.com,2008:/weblog//1.522</id>
    
    <published>2008-08-19T14:52:04Z</published>
    <updated>2008-08-19T14:57:05Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Republic Services Inc. (NYSE: RSG), currently trading at $33.15 at Friday&apos;s closing bell, is in demand. As the waste industry moves to consolidate, three of the top players are jockeying for the dominating position. The current industry leader, Waste Management...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mike - Editor</name>
        <uri>http://www.ManagingMoney.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="News" />
    
        <category term="Stocks" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.managingmoney.com/weblog/">
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>Republic Services Inc. (NYSE: RSG)</strong>, currently trading at $33.15 at Friday's closing bell, is in demand.  As the waste industry moves to consolidate, three of the top players are jockeying for the dominating position.  The current industry leader, <strong>Waste Management (NYSE: WMI)</strong> originally announced $ 34/ share bid for Republic Services on July 11th, and more recently raised that offer to $37/ share. Republic Services has rejected both bids saying that the company is worth substantially more than that as an independent entity. Waste Management made its initial offer as a response to the merger, announced June 23rd, between Republic Services and <strong>Allied Waste Industries (NYSE: AW)</strong>. The merger would combine the 2nd and 3rd largest solid waste services companies in a bid to rival the current dominance of Waste Management.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>At What Price?</strong></p>

<p>In what has been an uncivil discourse to date, Republic Services continues to tell Waste Management that its bids are unwelcome and the company is not for sale. Republic Services has refused to engage in ongoing talks with its insistent suitor. Waste Management has said it will evaluate its options in light of the most recent rejection.  Does this mean an even higher bid? Waste Management seems determined to hold on to its number one position, but how much more can they offer?  At some point, there is a number that Republic services must consider out of fiduciary duty to its shareholders. Some industry analysts have said $40/ share would be a fair valuation while others say that is too high a price and would negatively impact the buyer's financial status.  Remember that Republic was trading for a low of under $28/ share as recently as July 11th.  With news of the $37 offer, Republic briefly traded over $35 last week, but retreated as it became clear that its management would not accept the revised offer.</p>

<p><strong>Anti-trust Issues?</strong></p>

<p>A combination between Waste Management and Republic Services would dwarf the nearest remaining competitors, and position the giant well for future power plays. Such a deal would likely arouse the interest of the Justice Department's anti-monopoly watchdogs as well. So it isn't entirely clear that even if Waste Management could put together a deal acceptable to Republic Services that it would be allowed to go through anyway.  Even without Justice Department approval, however, such a deal would have the effect of preventing or substantially delaying any merger between Allied Waste and Republic Services. The latest offer from Waste Management offer included a provision for a $250 million payment to Republic if the acquisition were to be blocked by the Justice Department.<br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>How Much Life Insurance Do You Need</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.managingmoney.com/weblog/2008/08/how_much_life_insurance_do_you_2.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.managingmoney.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=513" title="How Much Life Insurance Do You Need" />
    <id>tag:www.managingmoney.com,2008:/weblog//1.513</id>
    
    <published>2008-08-18T14:57:33Z</published>
    <updated>2008-08-18T14:59:17Z</updated>
    
    <summary>For some people, the prospect of buying a life insurance policy that pays out upon their death is too close a look at their own mortality. Yet, at the same time, none of us want to leave our families financially...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Emma - Editor</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Insurance Planning" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.managingmoney.com/weblog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>For some people, the prospect of buying a life insurance policy that pays out upon their death is too close a look at their own mortality.  Yet, at the same time, none of us want to leave our families financially insecure when we die.  That's why it's critical to have sufficient life insurance. How much life insurance should you have? Below are some questions to consider.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>The most typical reason for purchasing life insurance is to ensure your spouse and dependents have sufficient funds to maintain their lifestyle.  To determine how much is needed to do that, consider these questions:</p>

<p><strong>1.  What lifestyle do you want to provide to your spouse and dependents when you die?</strong>  Review their needs in detail, taking a look at things like:</p>

<p>•	What standard of living do you want to provide?  Will your spouse and children live in the same house?  </p>

<p>•	Will the family have to make different child-care arrangements?</p>

<p>•	How many and what kinds of automobiles will be needed?</p>

<p>•	If your spouse works, will he/she decide to stay home with the children?</p>

<p>•	If your spouse stays at home, will he/she return to the work force?</p>

<p>•	Do you want to pay for your children's college educations?</p>

<p>•	What other financial help do you want to provide to your children?</p>

<p>•	Do you want to pay off a mortgage or other debt with insurance proceeds?</p>

<p>•	What are your spouse's retirement plans?  Is he/she counting on you for retirement income?</p>

<p>•	Do you need to consider the support of elderly parents or other relatives?</p>

<p><strong>2.  How much will that lifestyle cost?</strong>  Come up with an estimate of how much this lifestyle will cost.  Include all of your current expenses that would remain the same as well as any new expenses you have identified, such as for child care.  Remember to factor in hidden costs, such as providing for health insurance that was paid for by your employer.  For large debts, such as a mortgage, determine if it makes sense to pay the loan off in full or to continue making monthly payments. </p>

<p><strong>3.  How much life insurance do you need?</strong>  First, consider what other income sources your spouse and/or dependents will have.  This could include your spouse's earnings, retirement plans, Social Security benefits, savings, and investments.  Life insurance proceeds will be needed to provide the difference.  </p>

<p>Your life insurance needs will change over time, so you should periodically go through this analysis.  </p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Benefits of Low-Correlated Assets</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.managingmoney.com/weblog/2008/08/benefits_of_lowcorrelated_asse.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.managingmoney.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=515" title="Benefits of Low-Correlated Assets" />
    <id>tag:www.managingmoney.com,2008:/weblog//1.515</id>
    
    <published>2008-08-14T14:37:46Z</published>
    <updated>2008-08-14T14:46:30Z</updated>
    
    <summary>At first glance, asset correlation may seem like a complex topic. However, it is important to understand the concept and how it affects your portfolio. By combining assets with low correlation, you can potentially improve portfolio returns while reducing risk....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Nickie - Editor</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Investing Strategies" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.managingmoney.com/weblog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>At first glance, asset correlation may seem like a complex topic.  However, it is important to understand the concept and how it affects your portfolio.  By combining assets with low correlation, you can potentially improve portfolio returns while reducing risk.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Correlation is a statistical measure of how one asset class performs in relation to another asset class.  Correlations can range from +1 to –1.  A correlation of +1 means the two assets move very closely together in the same direction.  Combining assets with a high positive correlation will not provide much risk reduction.  A correlation of –1 indicates the assets move in opposite directions, a rare event in the investment world.  A correlation close to 0 means no relationship exists in the price movements of the two assets.</p>

<p>Combining assets with consistently high correlations to each other does little to reduce risk.  The greatest combination benefit to a portfolio seems to be achieved by combining assets with consistently low correlations, which results in consistently reduced risk.</p>

<p>When selecting investments for your portfolio, consider the diversification aspects for your overall portfolio.  While correlations change over time, general observations include:</p>

<p>•	Stocks tend to have a low positive correlation with corporate and government bonds.</p>

<p>•	Short-term bonds tend to have a low correlation with long-term bonds.</p>

<p>•	Stock markets around the world are all positively correlated to some degree.  In general, European stock markets are more closely correlated to each other and the U.S. than to markets in Japan or Asia.  Correlations between developed countries tend to be higher than correlations between developed and emerging countries.</p>

<p>•	Real estate tends to have a low correlation with stocks and bonds.</p>

<p>Past performance does not indicate future results. </p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Wachovia Worsens but Still Survives</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.managingmoney.com/weblog/2008/08/wachovia_worsens_but_still_sur.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.managingmoney.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=516" title="Wachovia Worsens but Still Survives" />
    <id>tag:www.managingmoney.com,2008:/weblog//1.516</id>
    
    <published>2008-08-13T15:06:29Z</published>
    <updated>2008-08-13T15:08:35Z</updated>
    
    <summary>After initially announcing job cuts of 6350 employees in July, Wachovia (NYSE: WB) this week said that as many as 6950 employees may now be out of work. That doesn’t include recent announcements of the departure of CFO Thomas J....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mike - Editor</name>
        <uri>http://www.ManagingMoney.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Banking" />
    
        <category term="News" />
    
        <category term="Stocks" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.managingmoney.com/weblog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>After initially announcing job cuts of 6350 employees in July, <strong>Wachovia (NYSE: WB)</strong> this week said that as many as 6950 employees may now be out of work. That doesn’t include recent announcements of the departure of CFO Thomas J. Wurtz, and Chief Risk Officer Don Truslow. Wachovia is expecting the job cuts to cost as much as $650 million as it restructures it workforce. Recent days have seen the announcement of a class action lawsuit from shareholders, regulatory investigations, and increases in the amount estimated losses originally announced just a few weeks ago.  Wachovia stock closed Monday at $18.21 per share off from its 52 week highs of more than $50.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>In addition to revising the expected job cut figure, Wachovia also revised its second quarter losses from the originally stated $8.86 billion to $9.11 billion. This represents a loss of $4.21 per share. The stock remained steady on Monday, gaining a little over 1.5%.  In July, Wachovia stock hit a low of just $7.80 per share. Investors who picked it up at that level have more than doubled their investment in a single month.</p>

<p>In the lawsuit, the firm Brodsky & Smith alleges that the Wachovia made “materially misrepresentations” that led to inflated stock prices. The suit is being brought on behalf of stockholders who purchased Wachovia’s stock at these alleged inflated levels between May 8th, 2006 and April 11th, 2008. While the class has not been certified at this point, Wachovia has vowed to fight the suit vigorously and has increased their reserves for legal expenses by half a million dollars.</p>

<p>That, though, seems the least of Wachovia’s worries at the moment. Federal and state securities investigators are pressing Wachovia on its municipal bond bid practices. You’ll recall that on July 17th, regulators raided the company’s headquarters after the company failed to fully comply with states’ subpoenas regarding auction-rate securities, according to the regulators. The municipalities and states that purchased these securities were left holding the bag after the market for them collapsed earlier this year.  Wachovia says they are in “active discussions” to settle the matter.</p>

<p>Going forward, the company expects losses from the mortgage portfolio it acquired in 2006 as part of its acquisition of Golden West to reach as high as 12%. The purchase of Golden West carried a $25 billion price tag back in 2006 before the mortgage and housing mess began spiraling out of control. Wachovia appears to have the resources to weather the storm and there is no sign of imminent collapse.<br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>How to Maintain Your Retirement Income</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.managingmoney.com/weblog/2008/08/how_to_maintain_your_retiremen.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.managingmoney.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=512" title="How to Maintain Your Retirement Income" />
    <id>tag:www.managingmoney.com,2008:/weblog//1.512</id>
    
    <published>2008-08-12T14:43:02Z</published>
    <updated>2008-08-16T19:06:48Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Saving enough by age 65 to ensure that you can maintain your standard of living through a long retirement has become increasingly difficult. Consider just this one fact. Current retirees receive close to 70% of their retirement income from Social...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mike - Editor</name>
        <uri>http://www.ManagingMoney.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Retirement Planning" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.managingmoney.com/weblog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Saving enough by age 65 to ensure that you can maintain your standard of living through a long retirement has become increasingly difficult. Consider just this one fact. Current retirees receive close to 70% of their retirement income from Social Security and defined-benefit pension plans, while today's workers will probably only receive one-third of their retirement income from those sources (Source: <em>Ibbotson Associates</em>, 2007).</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>While that means you will be responsible for a significant portion of your retirement income, Social Security and defined-benefit plans are a valuable component of that income. For years, we have heard that Social Security benefits are modest at best and should not be counted on as our only source of retirement income. Sometimes, it's even suggested to completely forget about Social Security benefits when planning for retirement, because changes in the system will probably be necessary when the huge number of baby boomers start retiring. But the fact is that Social Security benefits are a very valuable benefit, especially since benefits are adjusted for inflation annually.</p>

<p>For instance, the maximum Social Security benefit in 2008 for workers retiring at full retirement age is $2,185 monthly. While that might not seem like that much money, consider how much you would need to accumulate to generate that monthly income. A 66-year-old male would have to pay approximately $377,000 for an annuity that would pay $2,165 monthly for life with annual inflation adjustments, while a 66-year-old woman would pay approximately $421,000 (Source: <em>Vanguard</em>, 2008).</p>

<p>While only 21% of the work force is currently covered by a defined-benefit plan, it is a valuable benefit if you are covered by one. Defined-benefit plans typically don't adjust your benefits for inflation, but they will pay a benefit for your life or the joint lives of you and your spouse, depending on the option you choose.</p>

<p>But despite the value of Social Security and defined-benefit plans, you will probably be responsible for the majority of your retirement income, whether you obtain that income from 401(k) plans, individual retirement accounts (IRAs), or taxable investments. Before retiring, you will want to ensure that you have sufficient savings to support yourself for 20, 30, or even 40 years, depending on your age when you retire. </p>

<p>Deciding how much you need to accumulate by retirement age is difficult, since so many of the variables that go into that calculation are uncertain. To come up with an estimate, you need to make assumptions about your life expectancy, how much income you will need during retirement, how much you will receive from other retirement sources, when you will retire, your long-term rate of return on investments, future inflation, and future income tax rates. If your estimates are inaccurate, you could end up with little in the way of income in the later years of your life.</p>

<p>Because of all the uncertainty, it is typically recommended that you only withdraw modest amounts from your retirement savings, especially in the early years of your retirement. A common rule of thumb is to withdraw no more than 4% annually from your retirement funds. So if you want to withdraw $75,000 annually from your retirement assets, you'll need to accumulate $1,875,000 by retirement age.</p>

<p>But that 4% figure is based on the value of your investments when you are ready to make the withdrawal and is not a static number based on your savings when you retire. During periods of market volatility, your asset balances can fluctuate significantly, causing major changes in the recommended withdrawal amounts. Market fluctuations are especially dangerous during the early years of your retirement, when it can be difficult to make up for market declines while you are withdrawing money from those reduced balances. If you are not able to overcome market declines, you could be forced to drastically change your retirement plans.</p>

<p>How can you ensure that your retirement savings will last a lifetime? Consider these points:</p>

<p>•	<strong>Annuitize a portion of your retirement assets.</strong>  This will provide you with a definite monthly income for the rest of your life. Annuities can be purchased with or without inflation protection. Since an annuity is paid for the rest of your life, it protects you from outliving your savings and from the risk that lower-than-expected investment returns will reduce your portfolio. Typically, the benefits will end once you (and your spouse if you elect joint benefits) die, although some annuities will pay a lump sum or periodic benefit to beneficiaries. Thus, it is important to understand that if you (and your spouse if you elect joint benefits) die at a relatively young age, your benefits may not equal the purchase price of the annuity. While you probably do not want to use all of your retirement assets to purchase an annuity, you may want to use enough to purchase an annuity that will cover your regular monthly expenses.</p>

<p>•	<strong>Withdraw conservative amounts from your retirement assets.</strong>  If you limit your withdrawals to 3% or 4% of your balance, the assets should last for decades. At least annually, reassess your retirement assets and make sure that your withdrawals are reasonable based on your current balances. Market fluctuations can cause your asset allocation to get out of line, so you should rebalance at least annually. Even during retirement, you should allocate your assets among a variety of investment types, ensuring that your allocation is appropriate for your specific situation.</p>

<p>•	<strong>Maximize other sources of income.</strong>  While Social Security benefits and defined-benefit plan benefits will likely only provide moderate income, don't totally discount these income sources. Delay Social Security benefits as long as possible, until age 70, to maximize the benefits you will receive. These benefits are also adjusted annually for inflation. While defined-benefit plans are becoming increasingly rare, make sure you apply for benefits if you are covered.</p>

<p>•	<strong>Look for other ways to remove risk from your retirement investments.</strong>  There are a variety of portfolio strategies that can help cushion the impact of market fluctuations. If your portfolio is properly diversified, downturns in one asset class can be offset to at least some extent by the performance of other assets in your portfolio. </p>

<p>•	<strong>Reach retirement with minimal expenses.</strong>  Cut back on your living expenses before retirement, and try to enter retirement with as few debts as possible. Mortgage and consumer debt payments consume a significant portion of most people's income. Pay off those debts by retirement, and you can significantly reduce your cost of living. This can have a two-fold impact on your retirement. First, it frees up money to set aside for retirement. Second, you get used to a lower standard of living, which should also reduce the cost of your retirement lifestyle.</p>

<p>•	<strong>Work as long as possible.</strong>  While there is something very alluring about totally retiring from the work force, the reality is that a long retirement is very costly. Working a few more years can go a long way in helping fund your retirement. Those years are typically your highest earning years, so hopefully you will save significant sums during that period. Also, every year you work is one year you don't have to support yourself with your retirement savings. Once you are ready to retire, try to work at least part-time during the early years of your retirement. That doesn't mean you have to stay at your current job. You can find a totally different job or start a business. Even modest earnings can help significantly with retirement expenses.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Fannie Mae – The Next Six Months are Key</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.managingmoney.com/weblog/2008/08/fannie_mae_the_next_six_months.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.managingmoney.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=511" title="Fannie Mae – The Next Six Months are Key" />
    <id>tag:www.managingmoney.com,2008:/weblog//1.511</id>
    
    <published>2008-08-11T14:26:21Z</published>
    <updated>2008-08-11T15:13:03Z</updated>
    
    <summary>The ailing housing market is driving widening losses at Fannie Mae (NYSE: FNM). According to their latest earnings report, released on August 8th, Fannie Mae showed a net loss of $2.3 billion for the second quarter alone. This comes on...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mike - Editor</name>
        <uri>http://www.ManagingMoney.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="News" />
    
        <category term="Real Estate" />
    
        <category term="Stocks" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.managingmoney.com/weblog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The ailing housing market is driving widening losses at <strong>Fannie Mae (NYSE: FNM).  </strong>According to their latest earnings report, released on August 8th, Fannie Mae showed a net loss of $2.3 billion for the second quarter alone.  This comes on top of a $2.2 billion loss reported for the first quarter of this year.  This time the loss was primarily driven by higher than expected mortgage defaults and foreclosures.  Fannie Mae reports that based on their mortgage portfolio performance in July, they expect things to get worse going forward.  Loss reserves were increased by $3.7 billion in the quarter with more cash expected to be reserved against losses in Q3.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>According to President and CEO, Daniel H. Mudd, “Our second quarter results reflect challenging conditions in the housing and mortgage markets that began in 2006 and have deepened through 2007 and 2008.” <br />
 <br />
The consensus of analysts’ earnings estimate for Q2 was a loss of only 69 cents a share.  The announcement of a $2.54 per share loss renewed expectations that Fannie Mae would need a government bailout package to survive.  Mudd, however, told investors that Fannie Mae was still financially strong and a bailout would most likely not be needed. If Mudd is wrong and the government does indeed need to bail them out, the equity investors would be hurt the most.</p>

<p>The company predicted that 2008 would be the peak of the crisis and that conditions would likely improve starting next year.  In the meantime, Fannie Mae has taken steps to preserve their working capital.  One of the most visible of those steps for investors is the slashing of the common stock dividend from a previous 35 cents per share to a paltry 5 cents per share.  This move reduced the stock’s yield to about 2% annually, compared to the previous double digit yield.</p>

<p>As a result of the announcement, Fannie Mae was trading down more than 17% in early trading on Friday morning.  Just minutes after the opening bell, Fannie Mae had plummeted to $8.30 per share, but recovered to $9.00 within the market’s first hour. Indeed, with another bad quarter expected ahead, investors apparently see more downside for the stock in the near term.  If Fannie Mae sees recovery more than six months away, it is difficult to see a reason to hold onto the stock, especially in the absence of a meaningful dividend.</p>

<p>Just two days earlier, <strong>Freddie Mac (NYSE: FRE)</strong> reported a loss of $821 million due to foreclosures and delinquent loans.  Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae together account for nearly $1 of every $2 of outstanding mortgage debt in the United States.<br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Stock Market Lessons From the Past</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.managingmoney.com/weblog/2008/08/post_6.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.managingmoney.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=508" title="Stock Market Lessons From the Past" />
    <id>tag:www.managingmoney.com,2008:/weblog//1.508</id>
    
    <published>2008-08-08T14:29:54Z</published>
    <updated>2008-08-08T15:08:23Z</updated>
    
    <summary>The stock market volatility of the past few years has taught some valuable lessons about the stock market. In essence, the stock market tends to revert to the mean. Avoid strategies designed to “get rich quick” in the stock market,...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Nickie - Editor</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Stocks" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.managingmoney.com/weblog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The stock market volatility of the past few years has taught some valuable lessons about the stock market. In essence, the stock market tends to revert to the mean. Avoid strategies designed to “get rich quick” in the stock market, and diversify, diversify, diversify.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>•	<strong>The market tends to revert to the mean.</strong>  There is a tendency for the stock market, when it has an extended period of above or below average returns, to revert back to the average return.  Thus, following an extended period of above-average returns in the 1990s, the stock market experienced a significant downturn, helping to bring the averages back in line.</p>

<p>•	<strong>Don’t chase performance.</strong>  Investors often move out of sectors that are not performing well, investing that money in investments that are currently high performers.  But the market is cyclical, and often those high performers are poised to underperform, while the sectors just sold are ready to outperform.  Rather than trying to guess which sector is going to outperform, make sure your portfolio is broadly diversified across a range of investment sectors.</p>

<p>•	<strong>Avoid strategies designed to “get rich quick” in the stock market.</strong>  The stock market is a place for investment, not speculation.  When your expectations are too high, you have a tendency to chase after high-risk investments.  Your goal should be to earn reasonable returns over the long term, investing in high-quality stocks.</p>

<p>•	<strong>Don’t avoid selling a stock because you have a loss.</strong>  When selling a stock with a loss, an investor has to admit that he/she made a mistake, which is psychologically difficult to do.  When evaluating your stock investments, objectively review the prospects of each one, making decisions to hold or sell on that basis rather than on whether the stock has a gain or loss.</p>

<p>•	<strong>Make sure an investment will add diversification benefits to your portfolio.</strong>  Diversification helps reduce the volatility in your portfolio, since various investments will respond differently to economic events and market factors.  Yet it’s common for investors to keep adding investments that are similar in nature.  This does not add much in the way of diversification, while making the portfolio more difficult to monitor.</p>

<p>•	<strong>Check your portfolio’s performance periodically.</strong>  While everyone likes to think their portfolio is beating the market averages, many investors simply don’t know for sure.  So thoroughly analyze your portfolio’s performance periodically.  </p>

<p>•	<strong>No one knows where the market is headed.</strong>  No one has shown a consistent ability to predict where the market is headed in the future.  So don’t pay attention to either gloomy or optimistic predictions.  Instead, approach investing with a formal plan so you can make informed decisions with confidence.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>General Motors Sales and Stock Price Continue to Decline</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.managingmoney.com/weblog/2008/08/general_motors_sales_and_stock.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.managingmoney.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=510" title="General Motors Sales and Stock Price Continue to Decline" />
    <id>tag:www.managingmoney.com,2008:/weblog//1.510</id>
    
    <published>2008-08-06T15:57:39Z</published>
    <updated>2008-08-06T16:01:07Z</updated>
    
    <summary>It should come as no surprise in this economy that US auto sales are down dramatically. General Motors (GM) last week posted a $15.5 billion loss for the most recent quarter. Fully $9.2 billion of this loss was related to...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mike - Editor</name>
        <uri>http://www.ManagingMoney.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="News" />
    
        <category term="Stocks" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.managingmoney.com/weblog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>It should come as no surprise in this economy that US auto sales are down dramatically. <strong>General Motors (GM)</strong> last week posted a $15.5 billion loss for the most recent quarter.  Fully $9.2 billion of this loss was related to one-time expenses as the company wrote down assets, dealt with restructuring costs and expenses related to ailing Delphi. For the balance of the loss, General Motors cited plummeting SUV prices and poor sales overall along with corresponding declines in its financing operations as the primary contributors to the loss.  July 2008’s sales for General Motors fell more than 27 percent compared to the same month a year ago.  This compares to <strong>Ford’s</strong> 15 percent year on year sales decline for July.  </p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>General Motors’ Workforce Reductions</strong></p>

<p>General Motors had earlier offered buyouts and early retirement to its workers and reported that approximately 19,000 workers had accepted the deal by the deadline of July 1st.  Most of those employees have already left the payroll.  With the new losses, General Motors stated that they may be offering a new round of buyouts for hourly workers in the coming months. As the overall economy continues to struggle, though, jobless claims are on the rise. Workers may do well to consider hanging on to the jobs they’ve got as long as they can.</p>

<p><strong>Pain at the Pump Equals Pain for Car Dealers</strong></p>

<p>While month to month results may vary going forward, we would expect auto sales to remain in decline for the rest of this year and substantially all of 2009.  For the time being, the automakers are at the mercy of the broader US economy.  Automakers are desperately trying to lower their inventories of SUVs and gas-guzzling trucks as these vehicles look to be the hardest hit by soaring gasoline prices.  Once again fuel economy is a key concern for American consumers when searching for a new car.  <br />
General Motors’ North American sales the most recent quarter were off by 20% or about $10 billion.  Outside of North America, however, General Motors sales showed an increase of $1.7 billion.<br />
  <br />
<strong>General Motors Stock Outlook</strong></p>

<p>In addition to this news, remember that GM announced the suspension of its dividend on July 15th in order to preserve liquidity and increase available cash.  As long as fewer Americans are taking a ride in a new General Motors car, the stock looks to continue its own ride downhill.  Coming off 52 week highs of over $44/ share, General Motors traded under $10/ share on Monday.<br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Chevron&apos;s Q2 Earnings</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.managingmoney.com/weblog/2008/08/chevrons_q2_earnings.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.managingmoney.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=509" title="Chevron's Q2 Earnings" />
    <id>tag:www.managingmoney.com,2008:/weblog//1.509</id>
    
    <published>2008-08-04T14:00:35Z</published>
    <updated>2008-08-04T14:02:12Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Chevron (NYSE: CVX) announced its second quarter earnings on August 1st. Although Chevron didn’t match Exxon’s $1500 per second for the quarter, they did earn over $760 for each second of the second quarter. Chevron reported net income of $6...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mike - Editor</name>
        <uri>http://www.ManagingMoney.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="News" />
    
        <category term="Stocks" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.managingmoney.com/weblog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Chevron (NYSE: CVX) announced its second quarter earnings on August 1st.  Although Chevron didn’t match Exxon’s $1500 per second for the quarter, they did earn over $760 for each second of the second quarter.  Chevron reported net income of $6 billion up 11% from the same quarter a year ago.  That translates to earnings of $2.90/ share diluted, a shortfall from analysts’ consensus estimates of $3.03. Strong oil prices were the biggest contributor to the gain.  Natural gas prices were also a strong contributor.</p>

<p>Chevron also reported in their August 1st press release that their refining operations were hurt by the high cost of crude as the price of gasoline did not keep pace with the rising cost of oil.  As a result Chevron reported a loss of $734 million in its refining operations.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Declines in Chevron Oil Production<br />
Despite the high price of oil, Chevron was only able to produce 702,000 oil-equivalent barrels compared to over 750,000 in the same period a year ago.  The company blames the decline on natural field declines.  As an oil field becomes depleted over time, it can be increasingly difficult to pull the oil out.  Many experts are predicting that oil production is at or near peak levels since many of the world’s biggest oil fields are already in a period of steady decline.  The search for new oil fields is increasingly focusing on areas that are more expensive to explore and operate, such as deep-water ocean locations.  This points to oil prices remaining high for the foreseeable future.  We may see some short-term downward pressures as the high cost of gasoline in the US has led to a substantial decline in the total miles driven in this country.  China may also be enacting strong curtailing restrictions on automobiles during the run-up to the Olympic Games, in an effort to reduce smog over the Olympic venues.  Over the mid to long term, however, we foresee oil demand continuing to rise while supply faces a difficult time in trying to keep pace.<br />
Chevron’s Exploration Spending Plan<br />
In a speech made at the 2008 World Petroleum Conference, John Watson, Chevron’s Executive Vice President of Strategy and Planning, announced that Chevron alone is planning $22.9 billion in capital and exploratory spending in 2008, a 15% increase over 2007.  “These investments are being made along the entire energy value chain: from exploration and production; to refining and transportation; to geothermal, solar, cellulosic biofuels and other emerging technologies,” he said.<br />
Chevron stock closed at $84.42 on Friday after the release of the earnings announcement.  This is down from the stock’s high-water mark of $104/ share set back in May of 2008.  Chevron currently pays a $0.65/ share quarterly dividend representing a very respectable 3.1% yield at the current price.  Compare that to Exxon’s 2% dividend yield.<br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Magic Jack: Quality Phone Service for Less Than $20/Year</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.managingmoney.com/weblog/2008/08/magic_jack_quality_phone_servi.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.managingmoney.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=506" title="Magic Jack: Quality Phone Service for Less Than $20/Year" />
    <id>tag:www.managingmoney.com,2008:/weblog//1.506</id>
    
    <published>2008-08-01T14:17:55Z</published>
    <updated>2008-08-01T14:19:08Z</updated>
    
    <summary>If you’re tired of paying high telephone bills each month and are looking for a low cost option, there is a new, cutting-edge type of telephone service: Magic Jack. Magic Jack is a small device that easily plugs into a...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mike - Editor</name>
        <uri>http://www.ManagingMoney.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Expense Reduction" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.managingmoney.com/weblog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>If you’re tired of paying high telephone bills each month and are looking for a low cost option, there is a new, cutting-edge type of telephone service: Magic Jack. Magic Jack is a small device that easily plugs into a USB port on your computer. After plugging the device into your USB port, all you have to do is plug in the telephone of your choice, and you’ll hear a dial tone, enabling you to start making phone calls. Of course, you have to have broadband internet service on your computer in order for Magic Jack to work. In order to start enjoying your new telephone service with Magic Jack, all you have to do is pay the $39.95 initial charge, plus shipping and handling, and then make one $19.95 payment each year. With Magic Jack, you get many popular phone features absolutely free. Call Id, voicemail, three-way calling, call waiting, directory assistance, and free long distance throughout the U.S and Canada.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>If you’re leery about purchasing Magic Jack and fear that you may receive poor quality service similar to traditional Voip service, there is no reason to worry because Magic Jack is superior to all the other Voip services. Positive reviews by BBC, CNBC, New York Times, and many other reputable companies have given Magic Jack positive reviews. Companies like these wouldn’t sacrifice their reputations in order to stand by a product unless it had actually proven its reliability, just as Magic Jack has.</p>

<p>Due to the fact that each Magic Jack unit comes pre-programmed with a telephone number, you won’t be able to transfer your current phone number, but most people who invest in this product feel that this is a small inconvenience and that the product is totally worth this minor inconvenience. This is especially true considering the offer Magic Jack is currently offering. With this special, when you purchase a Magic Jack device, you get your first year of service absolutely free. You also get a 30-day money-back guarantee if you aren’t satisfied with your service.</p>

<p>Many Magic Jack users love their new phone service, because not only is it the most economical telephone service available, but it also has great portability. The device easily unplugs and goes wherever you and your computer go. It doesn’t matter is you go to a hotel and want to avoid extra room charges for using their phone, or traveling out of the country and want to contact family and friends back in the U.S. for free, Magic Jack can help you achieve these goals for no additional cost. </p>

<p>Anyone can afford $19.95/year, and paying this amount for quality, dependable home telephone service is practically like receiving your phone service free. Most Voip telephone providers charge that amount or more each month, and landline telephone providers usually charge triple that amount each month. So if you want to save hundreds of dollars or more a year, forget Vonage or your local telephone provider and take advantage of the convenience, ease and low cost of Magic Jack. <br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>WaMu Online Savings Goes Up to 3.75% APY</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.managingmoney.com/weblog/2008/07/wamu_online_savings_goes_up_to.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.managingmoney.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=505" title="WaMu Online Savings Goes Up to 3.75% APY" />
    <id>tag:www.managingmoney.com,2008:/weblog//1.505</id>
    
    <published>2008-07-31T14:56:49Z</published>
    <updated>2008-07-31T15:10:31Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Washington Mutual, sponsor of the WaMu Online Savings Account, raised their interest rate today to 3.75% APY. This new rate makes WaMu the highest of the 15 different online accounts that ManagingMoney.com tracks....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mike - Editor</name>
        <uri>http://www.ManagingMoney.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Banking" />
    
        <category term="News" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.managingmoney.com/weblog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Washington Mutual, sponsor of the WaMu Online Savings Account, raised their interest rate today to 3.75% APY. This new rate makes WaMu the highest of the 15 different online accounts that ManagingMoney.com tracks.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this difficult economic environment, banks are looking for stable funding sources. Consumer savings accounts have traditionally been very stable money, as most people deposit funds and leave them there for years.  This allows the banks to match these funds with longer term loans. Washington Mutual, by raising their rate above that of their competitors, is announcing that they are willing to aggressively compete for these funds. To find out more about the WaMu Online Savings account or other FDIC-insured online providers, visit the <a href="http://www.managingmoney.com/banking_main1_apy.php?category=Savings%20Accounts">ManagingMoney.com Savings Account Center</a>.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Mobile Homes: Buying a Dream Home for Less</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.managingmoney.com/weblog/2008/07/mobile_homes_buying_a_dream_ho.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.managingmoney.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=504" title="Mobile Homes: Buying a Dream Home for Less" />
    <id>tag:www.managingmoney.com,2008:/weblog//1.504</id>
    
    <published>2008-07-30T14:00:11Z</published>
    <updated>2008-07-30T14:07:37Z</updated>
    
    <summary>If you think you’ll never own the home of your dreams because of the costs involved, then perhaps you should reconsider. Most people who would like to become homeowners never consider purchasing a mobile home for whatever reason. What these...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mike - Editor</name>
        <uri>http://www.ManagingMoney.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Expense Reduction" />
    
        <category term="Real Estate" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.managingmoney.com/weblog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>If you think you’ll never own the home of your dreams because of the costs involved, then perhaps you should reconsider. Most people who would like to become homeowners never consider purchasing a mobile home for whatever reason. What these people don’t realize is that they’re missing out on possibly living in a beautiful home for substantially less than a regular house. Most people associate mobile homes with run-down trailers in parks with many low-income individuals. Now while these types of homes that are in serious need of repair and updating do exist, these are not the only types of mobile homes are available. Believe it or not, there are some mobile homes that are as large as 5 bedrooms and 3 bathrooms, and come with central air, Jacuzzi tubs, game rooms, and many other luxury amenities.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>By choosing to purchase a mobile home as an alternative, you don’t have to necessarily live in a park with several other mobile homes. If you chose to live in a park because you don’t own land to place your new home on, or it’s just easier somehow, you can of course place your home in a park. If, however, you don’t wish to live in a mobile home park and desire more privacy, you can purchase your land separately so that you won’t have to follow the rules that the mobile home park may have. You also have the option of purchasing your mobile home with a land/home option, where the bank that you choose to finance your new mobile home would include the cost of the land in your payment as well. </p>

<p>Aside from a lower price for a mobile home, there are also other advantages to owning a mobile home instead of a traditional home. If for some reason you ever chose to move to a different area but didn’t want to leave your home, you could always take the home with you. You could hire a service that specializes in moving relocating mobile homes and take the home wherever you wish to move, as long as you have an appropriate lot to place the home on. </p>

<p>If on the other hand you don’t plan to move for a while, and whenever you do you will move to a new home, there are ways to set your mobile home up on a on a permanent foundation on a private lot to make it look similar to a traditional non-mobile home. Visitors are often unable to distinguish mobile homes set up in such a way from regular houses. Some mobile homeowners choose to build onto their mobile homes and add extra rooms for extra storage and space. </p>

<p>If you would like to own your own home someday soon yet don’t have the money to pay a hefty monthly mortgage payment, why not consider a brand new, luxury mobile home? If you do decide to purchase a mobile home but choose to totally eliminate a monthly payment, you could still purchase one with cash, which would give you even more of a substantial savings. Given the right deal, you could pay less for a nice used mobile home, including renovations and updates, than you would for a down payment on a traditional home.<br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>How To Greatly Increase Your Chances of Keeping Your Rental Units Occupied</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.managingmoney.com/weblog/2008/07/how_to_greatly_increase_your_c.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.managingmoney.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=503" title="How To Greatly Increase Your Chances of Keeping Your Rental Units Occupied" />
    <id>tag:www.managingmoney.com,2008:/weblog//1.503</id>
    
    <published>2008-07-28T14:05:23Z</published>
    <updated>2008-07-28T14:13:51Z</updated>
    
    <summary>If you have properties to rent out and are having trouble finding tenants, there are several things that you can do to increase the odds of keeping all of your units occupied, which will in turn equal more income for...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mike - Editor</name>
        <uri>http://www.ManagingMoney.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Real Estate" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.managingmoney.com/weblog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>If you have properties to rent out and are having trouble finding tenants, there are several things that you can do to increase the odds of keeping all of your units occupied, which will in turn equal more income for you. Many property owners have a difficult time keeping their units occupied and generating income, but you don’t have to be one of them. By practicing a few simple tactics, you can drive more attention to your available units than you ever have in the past.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>One thing that makes a successful landlord is to be somewhat flexible and understanding when it comes to problems that your renters may have. If you see that a tenant simply can’t afford to pay his or her rent anymore, then graciously asking them to move might be your best bet. On the other hand, if one of your tenants pays their rent a week late for a 1 or 2 months, it’s no reason to immediately evict them. As long as they are not more than a few days to a few weeks late once or twice, you should consider giving them a break. Everyone has money problems from time to time, but it doesn’t mean that it will be constant, or that your tenants are irresponsible. It’s certainly not wise to allow your tenants to become a month or two behind, or pay late on a consistent basis, but communicating with your renters and treating them like human beings will go a long way. </p>

<p>One thing that you need to remember when you’re renting out properties is to ask for a reasonable security deposit, which is often referred to as a damage deposit. This deposit protects you in case there is some type of damage once your renter’s move out. If there is any damage, you can simply subtract the amount of the damage from the deposit and refund the remaining amount. Asking an unusually high amount for a security deposit can really hurt your chances of renting out the properties. Most people agree that a deposit equivalent to a month’s rent is reasonable, but anything more, such as separate cleaning fees, can cause perspective tenants to search elsewhere. With the economy in its current undesirable state, many people simply can’t come up with a hefty security deposit in addition to the first month’s rent. One thing that you could do to increase your chances of renting out the properties regardless of the amount of the deposit is to allow the tenants to pay the deposit in increments. </p>

<p>If you’re having trouble renting out a property and you have adequate advertising, as well as plenty of responses, there may be some things that you need to check. If the unit is extremely outdated, doesn’t have any amenities, or is in disrepair, you should definitely make some improvements before you can expect to rent it out. Even small and inexpensive changes can make a big difference, such as removing old, unsightly wallpaper and applying a fresh coat of paint, or removing old stain-covered carpet. Remember: if you wouldn’t live in one of your rentals because of its unattractive conditions, you can’t expect others to, either.</p>

<p>If merely having a sign in front of the units that you have for rent and/or placing an ad in your local newspaper hasn’t helped to bring enough potential tenants, one way that will definitely bring many interested individuals is to post your listings on Craigslist. Just about everyone knows how popular Craiglist is, and the fact that it’s free to place as many ads as you like is certainly a plus. By going this route, you’re bound to get numerous responses, maybe more than you can handle, actually.</p>

<p>By having a rigid approval process, you could possibly enable you to locate some decent, responsible tenants to rent your properties. On the other hand, such a process may cause you to have a difficult time renting them out. Not everyone has great credit, but just because perspective tenants may have less-than-perfect credit doesn’t mean that they aren’t responsible or won’t pay their rent on-time each month. Instead of checking credit, one thing that can be just as helpful in helping you locate the best possible tenants is to perform background, rental history, and job reference checks. These checks will still help prevent you from renting to people who have had trouble paying their rent in the past,  but without the necessity to delve into interested candidates’ past credit background.</p>

<p>There is no reason to have your rental properties sitting empty for months when you could be making a regular monthly income from each one you own. Empty units increase the likelihood of vandalism, and they also cost you more money if you are still paying a mortgage on the houses or apartments. This is why ensuring that each and every unit is occupied at all times should be your main concern. It’s not difficult to locate responsible renters, and you don’t even have to spend a great deal of money on advertising. As long as you have the level of determination and energy necessary to seek the appropriate tenants for your rentals, it’s very unlikely that any of your units will remain unoccupied for very long. <br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>VOIP: Money-saver or Waste of Money?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.managingmoney.com/weblog/2008/07/voip_moneysaver_or_waste_of_mo.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.managingmoney.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=502" title="VOIP: Money-saver or Waste of Money?" />
    <id>tag:www.managingmoney.com,2008:/weblog//1.502</id>
    
    <published>2008-07-25T16:19:37Z</published>
    <updated>2008-07-25T16:23:35Z</updated>
    
    <summary>With prices for just about everything soaring, people are searching for any way possible to save money. Aside from using coupons and looking for sales to shop for needed items in order to save on your grocery bill, or limiting...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mike - Editor</name>
        <uri>http://www.ManagingMoney.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Expense Reduction" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.managingmoney.com/weblog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>With prices for just about everything soaring, people are searching for any way possible to save money. Aside from using coupons and looking for sales to shop for needed items in order to save on your grocery bill, or limiting where you drive in order to save money on gas, there is another expense that you can choose to focus on: your home phone. Since mobile phones are so popular, and many come with unlimited talk plans for at or under $100 a month, many are opting to forego their home phones and rely on their cell phones exclusively. Others, however, don’t like to be without a home phone for whatever reason, and many resort to Voip (voice over internet phone).</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>As you know, in order for your phone service to work with Voip, you need to have high speed internet service. If for some reason your internet service fails, such as during a storm, you will be without telephone service. If you live in an area where there are frequent storms and you rely solely on your internet phone service, then perhaps making another choice for phone service would be a better idea. If choosing another telephone provider isn’t an option for you, then perhaps inexpensive mobile phone service could be used during emergency situations. Prepaid mobile phone service usually only require that you pay $20 every 90 days in order to maintain service, which would be an option for someone who only uses a mobile phone on rare occasions.</p>

<p>One obvious reason why people choose VOIP instead of a regular landline phone is because of the massive saving that is often involved. Consumers can save hundreds of dollars a year while enjoying free features, including voicemail. If you frequently use many of the popular phone features yet hate paying the high cost for landline service, internet phone service may actually be a good idea for you. Voice mail alone can cost as much as $10 a month with many landline phone providers, so this is evidently a great way to “have your cake and eat it too.”</p>

<p>Surprisingly, many providers of Voip service haven’t been providing the best customer service and technical support. Either customer service isn’t available when consumers require assistance, or the assistance provided is substandard. Whatever the case is, Voip users haven’t been too impressed with many of the internet phone providers. Of course some customers have been satisfied with their phone provider’s customer service, but if a majority of customers are receiving poor service, it isn’t a good thing for the consumer or the company.</p>

<p>Many VOIP users have complained of poor sound quality, whether they’re experiencing trouble with static on the line, difficulty hearing the person they’re speaking with, or the other party is unable to hear the Voip subscriber. This can be very frustrating, as well as a total waste of money. In this case, it’s not worth it to pay a lower phone bill if you can’t rely on the service that you’re paying for. There are some of the more well-known companies like Vonage, for instance, that may be somewhat more reliable, but Voip service is notorious for problems, unfortunately. Perhaps with constant improvements Voip service will soon become as reliable as landline service, but it hasn’t yet reached that point. </p>

<p>If you have been lucky enough to choose a Voip company that provides superior service, including technical support, and you don’t have many problems, if any at all, then Voip service may very well be worth it for you. Paying approximately $20/month for unlimited calls anywhere in the United States, the ability to use free phone features, as well as voice mail, is a great deal less than paying approximately $75 a month for the same with a landline. If you can save $55 a month, then you have obviously made an excellent choice. On the other hand, if your phone service is of poor quality, whether it’s the phone service itself or customer service, then you may be better off opting for an unlimited mobile phone plan or either basic phone service with minimal features, in order to keep your bill low each month.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

</feed> 

